aaryn belfer.

What a relief: Would you like your refund in installments or one lump sum?

Thanks to a perfect storm created by too many ballot initiatives, dipwad voters, Proposition 13 and Republicans so steeped in ideology that they’d rather watch the world’s eighth largest economy tank than—God forbid!—compromise, or worse yet, embrace some sort of socialistic shared sacrifice, California is officially in the shitter. But we got sunshine! And majestic state parks! Oh, wait…

Roughly 235,000 state employees recently accepted a third furlough day each month and now face the threat of a fourth from Gov. Recalled-The-Other-Guy-For-Bogus-Reasons Schwarzenegger, who is effectively sticking these folks with a 20-percent pay cut. That’s not weekly-latte territory. That’s desperate Jean Valjean territory. That’s murder-suicide territory. What’s The Terminator’s salary again?

Hardly unexpected, this long-in-the-making hose-job has finally snaked its way to the doorstep of our state universities. Both Cal State and UC—I work for the latter—voted recently on the best ways to close breathtaking budget gaps, and the results are not pretty. A nauseating combination of fee hikes, class-size increases, enrollment reductions, pay cuts, furloughs and layoffs are the wave of the future. Excuse me while I go lay down for a sec.

Every cloud has a silver lining though, and UCSD’s arrived in the form of a notification last week from the Office of the Chancellor, an announcement that Transportation Services has a plan to save the day. Well, that might be a bit dramatic, but you know me: I go for cinematic over catatonic every single time. Look alive, people. Stay with me.

Citing a desire to “ease our common financial burdens”—a wholly laughable and transparent phrase given the source—Chancellor Marye Anne Fox announced in a dour tone befitting both the collective mood and the scope of the proclamation, that the parking czars had “identified a way to provide some relief for faculty, staff and students through a temporary decrease in parking-permit fees.”

I’d like to say I read this e-mail with piqued interest. The truth, however, is that my eyelids drooped and my mouth smirked and I sighed as I read about this so-called relief, which wouldn’t pertain to me anyway since I got “relief” by canceling my $81 monthly parking pass in June. But I digress. I read without an ounce of inspiration about the 5-percent reduction in fees that Transportation Services would be offering to UCSD employees over the coming 11 months.

Now, I’m not great at doing math in my head unless it comes to working out a tip. And while I got an A in calculus during college, I cannot to this day balance a checkbook without being reduced to tears.

However.

It doesn’t take intimate knowledge of the Archimedean Property to know that 5 percent of $81 isn’t even enough to buy the average married couple a weeks’ worth of condoms. Barring contraception, it isn’t enough for one 24-ounce can of Nestle Good Start Baby Formula or a travel pack of diapers. You picking up what I’m laying down?

Still, I wanted to include an accurate number for the piece of mind I intended to send the chancellor, so I got out my calculator and clarified that 5 percent of $81 is $4.05. A month. That’s a grand total of $44.55 a year, 45 cents shy of one campus parking ticket. These are not exactly numbers that will alleviate murderous impulses borne of financial ruin. Then again, it is 10 Big Macs, and perhaps 5,400 extra burger calories would make even the most desperate person too sluggish for violence.

To be fair—or, to be fairly ridiculous depending on your point of view—$4.05 a month can totally make a difference, and I suspect this is the logic of those generous folks in Transportation Services, who regularly pat themselves on the back for their creative altruism.

They must know, for example, that $4.05 can buy one pint of Häagen-Dazs ice cream from Vons, provided you possess one of those evil Club Cards that track your shopping habits and DNA and proclivity for pop-culture and porn. If Skippy peanut butter is on special for $1.49, you can get two jars and still have a little change left over for the couch cushions. Ramen noodles are generally a safe budgetary bet, as are SPAM and Campbell’s Soup. But most beer is out of the price range, so you’ll have to gag down Two Buck Chuck if you intend to drown your sorrows. A pack of smokes is out of the question, but you should really quit anyway since $4.05 won’t begin to cover the co-pay for emphysema treatments.

What $4.05 will cover, for now at least, is that extra gallon-ish of gas, which will subsequently get you to your parking spot, which will subsequently get you to the office, where you subsequently won’t be paid for your time thanks to imminent pay cuts, which will be offset by the rather insulting, condescending, seriously disingenuous reduction in parking fees gussied up to look like relief. I think I need to get horizontal again.

Had I been consulted on how to alleviate some of the burden, I would have suggested a meaningful 25-percent reduction in fees for an entire year and an increase in the fees associated with parking tickets. But what the hell do I know? I’m no good at ledgers and whatnot.

“With this meager discount on parking,” I wrote in my e-mail to the chancellor, “you might as well say more plainly what you disguise in sympathy: Let them eat cake.”

Or Big Macs. They’re more affordable.


(As published in today’s issue of San Diego CityBeat.)


10 Comments

Did you see this solution to the UC budget problems?

http://www.blogher.com/faculty-self-interest-trumps-collegiality-university-california

Posted by Jen F on 22 July 2009 @ 6am

are they actually still paying you money? or just IOUs ?
… and not meaning in any way to defend the governator, I believe the only income he is making is from royalties and his wife, I am pretty sure he passed on the governor salary

Posted by Jenn on 22 July 2009 @ 12pm

Your writing is just brilliant.

Posted by san on 22 July 2009 @ 3pm

Heh, it was $4 pre-tax, so we probably won’t even see all of that in our paychecks… maybe only $2.50.

Posted by Christine on 28 July 2009 @ 4pm

Governor Schwarzenegger doesn’t draw a salary I believe. I would be interested to read your take on the reason for the State budget being in such a mess as follows: there are more takers than givers (and the givers are getting sick and tired of it).

Posted by MAYBELLINE on 3 August 2009 @ 11am

MAYBELLINE: You are right. The Gov doesn’t take a salary. As for my take on your reason, it goes like this: It’s right-wing misguided bullshit. No offense.

Posted by Aaryn on 6 August 2009 @ 10pm

Offense taken.
I believe a dude long ago thought it a better idea to teach people to fish rather than give them a fish.

Posted by MAYBELLINE on 7 August 2009 @ 11am

Well, MAYBELLINE, you did ask my opinion and I gave it. Straight up.

Now. I’m not steeped in knowledge of all the ideas of that dude from long ago. But I’m pretty sure he didn’t advocate that those with all the fish and fishing skills and access to tackle and bait and line and boats and boat-dock ramps and the most well-stocked fishing ponds and fish-gutting tools, turn their greedy, self-centered noses up at those without. Nor do I believe he advocated that the former work tirelessly, unscrupulously, purposefully (and as we’ve learned in recent months, sometimes illegally) to prevent those without access from the possibility of ever having any. But I guess we see what we want to see.

You know, not everybody who needs help is a lazy free-loader (new data show increasing numbers of middle class people lining up for the assistance you’re so incensed about giving). In fact, such a view is arrogant and cynical and, I would argue, largely antithetical to what the long ago dude believed. If he were alive today (if he was ever even alive in the first place), I think he’d be sick to his stomach to see how our society treats the least among us. Moreover, I think he’d be appalled at how his followers—by and large—twist things he is purported to have said, to best suit their own ideology and advancement, while at the same time oppressing their fellow humans.

Did you know that Gov. Schwarzenegger used his line-item veto to cut funding to California’s 94 Domestic Violence Shelters for women? Yes. He did. So that a woman who was beaten in the head with a hammer, repeatedly, and then stabbed in the face with a fork by her husband will have to find someplace else to hide herself and her children from her abuser while she tries to get on her feet. Now. I am fortunate that I will never have to use the services of just such a place. But I am not so lacking in compassion and an ability to put myself in the shoes of another, that I would be angry about some of my tax dollars being used for the operation of this shelter.

So forgive me for thinking that your note about the long ago dude and his fish seems severely simplistic and terrifically callous.

Posted by aaryn b. on 7 August 2009 @ 1pm

Wow- you got all that from the few words I typed? Dang it. I’m an inspiration.

Posted by MAYBELLINE on 7 August 2009 @ 2pm

Yes, you are an inspiration.

Posted by aaryn b. on 7 August 2009 @ 2pm

Leave a Comment